World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

French invasion of Honolulu

French Invasion

Honolulu Fort, 1853
Date August 22 - September 5, 1849
Location Honolulu, Hawaii
Result French tactical victory; strategically insignificant
  • French invade Honolulu.
    • Successfully capture Honolulu Fort
  • French withdrawal.
  • $100,000 in damages.
Belligerents
French Second Republic Kingdom of Hawaii
Commanders and leaders
Louis Tromelin Kamehameha III
Strength
1 frigate
1 corvette
140 Marines
1 fortress

The French invasion of Honolulu (also known as the Sacking of Honolulu, or the Tromelin Affair) was an attack on Honolulu by Louis Tromelin in retribution for the local persecution of Catholics and repression of French trade.

Contents

  • Prelude 1
  • Sacking of Honolulu 2
  • Aftermath 3
  • References 4
  • Bibliography 5

Prelude

On August 12, 1849, French admiral Louis Tromelin arrived in Honolulu Harbor on the corvette Gassendi with the frigate La Poursuivante.[1] While in Honolulu, De Tromelin found out about the past persecution of Catholics and the high tariffs on French brandy from French Consul William Patrice Dillon, who oversaw French interests in Hawaii. De Tromelin, angered by the ABCFM missionaries’ intention to shut out Catholicism and French trade, made ten demands to King Kamehameha III on August 22.[2]

  1. The complete and loyal adoption of the treaty of March 26th 1846.
  2. The reduction of the duty on French brandy to fifty per cent ad valorem.
  3. The subjection of Catholic schools to the direction of the chief of the French Mission and to special inspectors not Protestants and a treatment rigorously equal granted to the two worships and to their schools.
  4. The use of the French language in all business intercourse between French citizens and the Hawaiian Government.
  5. The withdrawal of the alleged exception by which French whalers which imported wine and spirits were affected and the abrogation of a regulation which obliged vessels laden with liquors to pay the custom house officers placed on board to superintend their loading and unloading.
  6. The return of all duties collected by virtue of the regulation the withdrawal of which was demanded by the fifth article.
  7. The return of a fine of twenty-five dollars paid by the whale ship General Teste besides an indemnity of sixty dollars for the time that she was detained in port.
  8. The punishment of certain school boys whose impious conduct in church had occasioned complaint.
  9. The removal of the governor of Hawaii for allowing the domicile of a priest to be violated by police officers who entered it to make an arrest or the order that the governor make reparation to that missionary.
  10. The payment to a French hotel keeper of the damages committed in his house by sailors from HBM″s [His Britannic Majesty '​s] ship Amphitrite.[1]

Sacking of Honolulu

The demands had not been met by August 25. After a second warning to the civilians of the impending invasion,[3] 140

  • Chariot, Jean (1970). "An 1849 Hawaiian Broadside". Hawaiian Journal of History 4 (Hawaii Historical Society). pp. 96–104.  
  • Hawaiian Journal of History: Devoted to the history of Hawaii, Polynesia and the Pacific area, Volume IV, 1967 
  • Alexander, William De Witt (1891), A brief history of the Hawaiian people, Board of Education of the Hawaiian Kingdom.,  
  • Owen, Jean Allan (1898), The story of Hawaii, Harper & Brothers 
  • Kuykendall, Ralph S. (1938), The Hawaiian Kingdom: Volume 1: Foundation and Transformation, 1778-1854, University of Hawaii Press,  
  • Daws, Gavan (December 1974), Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Islands, University of Hawaii Press,  

Bibliography

  1. ^ a b Alexander p.266
  2. ^ Hawaiian Journal p.2
  3. ^ Daws p.133
  4. ^ Hawaiian Journal p.9
  5. ^ Kuykendall p.395
  6. ^ Daws p.134
  7. ^ Kuykendall p.396
  8. ^ Kuykendall p.397

References

Gerrit P. Judd led a party to inquire and settle the incident, leaving for Paris on September 11. Along the way Judd requested support from the United States and Great Britain, the latter accepting for his case against Tromelin.[7] At first the French government condemned the attack on Honolulu but with the account of Tromelin and Dillon who left with Tromelin on September 5, the French government reconsidered the incident as more justified and did not make reparation for the damages.[8]

Aftermath

[6]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library on the Kindle are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.